A look at the massive sponsor contracts that FIFA could lose

Details of Fifa's sponsorship arrangements are hidden from view. But estimates have been made about some of its deals with the world's biggest companies

Fifa has come under mounting pressure from its sponsors in the wake of the investigation of 18 people over alleged bribes totalling more than $149 million (£98m).

The strongest words yet have come from Visa, which - unlike other Fifa partners - threatened to pull out of its deal.

This is believed to be worth $129 million (£85 million) over six years. The company said "we have informed them that we will reassess our sponsorship" unless Fifa makes changes.

Every one of Fifa's major sponsors has criticized the governing body, with the notable exception of Gazprom. The Russian energy giant is a sponsor for the 2018 World Cup in Russia. A spokesman said the arrests “doesn’t influence” the Russian gas producer’s sponsorship agreement for the World Cup in 2018.

This is not the first time that Fifa's sponsors have called for reform or had to criticise the organisation - in 2011, Coca-Cola, Emirates, Adidas and Visa have all expressed concern when allegations of corruption emerged from within the organisation.

The governing body has had a rough 12 months: Fifa partners Sony and Emirates, the airline, both declined to renew their contract as sponsors in November 2014. Sony's contract was worth an estimated $280m (£183m) over eight years, and Emirates is believed to have paid £118.3m over eight years. Emirates decided not to renew its deal beyond 2014 because the terms on offer “did not meet expectations”.

Second-tier 'sponsors', Castrol, Johnson & Johnson and Continental Tyres, all abandoned the governing body in January 2015.

Sponsors must weigh up whether being connected to Fifa's increasingly toxic brand is worth the profile that the relationship can provide.

Brand Finance, an intellectual property management company, argues that these big brands could lose up to $1bn (£653m) in value due to the reputational damage of being associated with Fifa.

Chief executive of Brand Finance David Haigh said: “Sponsors have partnered with Fifa in order to build their brands, not have their reputations tarnished. The kind of activities that are alleged to have been going on could destroy billions of dollars of brand value.

"A lot depends on what happens in the next few days but without knowing how quickly Fifa are going to clean out the Augean stables, my recommendation to the major sponsors would be to move towards the exit."

Nevertheless Fifa's revenues are healthier than ever: between 2011 and 2014, Fifa made total revenues of $5.7bn (£3.7bn); in 2014 alone - a World Cup year - the governing body made $2.1bn (£1.4bn).

Fifa makes $177m (£116m) a year from marketing deals with top-tier partner brands, which currently include Visa, Hyundai, Coca-Cola and Adidas.

The governing body does not disclose how much it is paid by sponsors, but the figures below provide a rough estimate.

Second-tier sponsors are believed to have paid between $10m to $25m (£6.5m to £25m) for four-year deals relating to the World Cup. These brands include McDonald's and Budweiser's parent group Anheuser Busch InBev, Brazilian telecommunications company Oi, Brazilian food processing company Seara, and Chinese solar energy company Yingli Solar.

Russian energy giant Gazprom is estimated to have paid between $80m and $100m (£52m to £65m) to become a Fifa partner for the 2018 World Cup.

Fifa makes most of its money by selling television rights to the World Cup. Other revenue streams come from selling hospitality rights, licensing the brand name, such as in Fifa's video games, ticketing and investments.

It is unclear exactly what Fifa spends all of this money on (although it did spend a reported £16m on the badly-reviewed film United Passions ).

John Whittingdale, the Minister for Culture, Media and Sport, told the House of Commons: “A change of leadership of Fifa is very badly needed.

“This is merely the latest sorry episode that suggests that Fifa is a deeply flawed and corrupt organization.

“It’s important that other sponsors reflect on their links to Fifa and consider following Visa’s lead."

Matt Powell, an analyst at NPD Group, a market research company told Bloomberg: “Certainly this tarnishes the Fifa brand.

“I expect that sponsors will show restraint until the story plays out a bit more. Once they know that convictions are in and understand the extent of the crimes, then sponsors will act.”

Who has said what?

In a statement, Visa said:

Our disappointment and concern with Fifa in light of (Wednesday's) developments is profound. As a sponsor, we expect Fifa to take swift and immediate steps to address these issues within its organisation. This starts with rebuilding a culture with strong ethical practices in order to restore the reputation of the games for fans everywhere.

Visa became a sponsor of Fifa because the World Cup is one of the few truly global sporting events with the power to unite people from around the world through a common love of football.

Our sponsorship has always focused on supporting the teams, enabling a great fan experience, and inspiring communities to come together and celebrate the spirit of competition and personal achievement - and it is important that Fifa makes changes now, so that the focus remain on these going forward. Should Fifa fail to do so, we have informed them that we will reassess our sponsorship."

South Korean car manufacturer Hyundai issued a strongly-worded statement which stopped short of threatening to end their deal:

As a company that places the highest priority on ethical standards and transparency, Hyundai Motor is extremely concerned about the legal proceedings being taken against certain Fifa executives and will continue to monitor the situation closely."

Coca-Cola said:

This lengthy controversy has tarnished the mission and ideals of the Fifa World Cup and we have repeatedly expressed our concerns about these serious allegations.

We expect Fifa to continue to address these issues thoroughly. Fifa has stated that it is responding to all requests for information and we are confident it will continue to cooperate fully with the authorities."

A spokesman for McDonald's, a second-tier sponsor, said:

McDonald's takes matters of ethics and corruption very seriously and the news from the US Department of Justice is extremely concerning. We are in contact with Fifa on this matter. We will continue to monitor the situation very closely."

Adidas said it was "fully committed to creating a culture that promotes the highest standards of ethics and compliance" and expects the same from its partners.

Dr Roger Barker, director of Corporate Governance of the Institute of Directors, said:

The large multinationals who pour hundreds of millions of pounds of sponsorship into Fifa’s coffers every year cannot turn a blind eye to the gross failures of corporate governance at the organisation.

These sponsors rightly make great efforts to ensure their own boards and reporting practices are up to scratch, and they have a responsibility to their shareholders to make certain that the company’s cash is not going towards sporting events mired in bribery and corruption allegations.

In turn, the shareholders of these sponsors must exert pressure on the boards to protect their company from the considerable reputational risk of being associated with this scandal-ridden organisation.

No business of Fifa’s size and vast revenues could possibly get away with allowing its executives to operate without meaningful accountability, and it is now time for Fifa's corporate backers to take a stand."

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Here's what 'Game of Thrones' stars look like in real life